ServicesResourcesConferencesOur TeamWeblogsAboutContact
   

Subscriptions

Post Categories

Affiliations

Archives

Why does the world need WS-ReliableMessaging?

In the last few months I have given a number of presentaions on WCF and had countless customer meetings. One of the most frequently asked question was why in the world we would need WS-ReliableMessaging (WS-RM). I think I had a good explanation, but now the infamous Shy Cohen posted a very nice and easy to understand answer to the MSDN WCF Forums.

The only real problem I currently have with the WS-RM implementation in WCF is that they do not have a durable store for the WS-RM messages. It is all in-memory and AppDomain-based. Tomas also thinks that this might become a problem in one or the other scenarios.

posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2006 12:13 PM

# WS-RM and WCF @ Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:17 PM

Christian Weyer about WCF’s WS-ReliableMessaging implementation: The only real problem I currently have with the WS-RM implementation in WCF is that they do not have a durable store for the WS-RM messages. It is all in-memory and AppDomain-based. I guess that makes it WS-SomewhatReliableMessaging ;-)...
Stefan Tilkov's Random Stuff

# re: Why does the world need WS-ReliableMessaging? @ Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:31 PM

Couldn't agree more with Stefan. It was a big disappointment to learn in "Programming Indigo" that WCF requires MSMQ if you want real asynchronous, decoupled web services. Until this is the case, WS-RX can't become an alternative for B2B protocols such as EDIINT/AS2, ebXML or RosettaNet (RNIF).
Guy Crets

# Affidabilit @ Thursday, February 23, 2006 11:45 AM


UGbLog di Pierre Greborio


Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems